As my college buddy ZQ used to say, “JT, money talk, bullshit walk.” In workers’ compensation and Utilization Review (UR), “money talk, injured workers walk.”
Workers’ comp patients are entitled to medical treatment for their on the job injuries according to the California State Constitution and Labor Code. But why
Independent Medical Review is the appeal process in workers’ compensation for Utilization Review denials of medical treatment. The IMR appeal goes to an anonymous state
The Court of Appeals in Stevens ruled that workers’ compensation IMR does not violate the California Constitution. IMR or Independent Medical Review, is the process
IMR Unconstitutional? Workers’ compensation law has never really made sense. Is it workers’ comp, or is it employers’ protection? Is workers’ comp law here
Past blogs have addressed the problems in workers’ compensation injured workers are having receiving medical treatment for their industrial injuries. Independent Medical Review (IMR) is
Workers’ compensation patients are entitled to medical treatment for their on the job injuries according to the California State Constitution and Labor Code. But why
Workers’ Compensation law requires employers and their workers’ comp carriers to provide medical treatment to injured workers for their industrial injuries. Workers’ comp law requires
Readers of the Beacon know that in 2004 the Governor, backed by employers and insurance companies, gutted the laws that were supposed to protect injured
Those unfortunate enough to get hurt on the job know big changes in workers’ compensation laws slammed injured workers in 2004. This attack included substantial
site by LegalRev
